Fantastical beast movie12/13/2023 ![]() ![]() It made over $800 million at the worldwide box office, and people generally thought it was all right. seemed to be banking on the idea that they could do anything related to Harry Potter, and it would do well, and for the first movie, it worked. The movie is trying to please both of those audiences, and by doing that, it is giving them both mediocre and frustrating films to watch. However, fans looking to see the story of Grindelwald and Dumbledore are going to be annoyed that we keep cutting back to these other characters like Newt, who don't seem to really matter and aren't who we are here to see. The people who enjoyed the first part of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them will be annoyed in movies two and three because Grindelwald and Dumbledore keep showing up and taking over the plot so there aren't really any fantastic beasts to be seen. The problem with this bait-and-switch is that it splits your audience. All of that was just set dressing, as they set up the infamous Grindelwald story and inevitably brought in Dumbledore as well. However, in the final parts of the movie, it revealed itself to not be about crazy-looking creatures at all. It was Harry Potter Pok'e'mon, and Newt Scamander was here to catch em' all. For what felt like roughly 85% of the film, we ran around watching a bunch of new characters try to catch a bunch of crazy-looking creatures and do magic. The problem is that the first movie was a bait-and-switch when it came to what it was actually about. That makes the vitriol toward the second movie and the apathy toward the third even more interesting. Entertainment Inc.įantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them was released in 2016, and while it wasn't exactly a critical darling, it did pretty well, and the fans seemed to think it was all right as well. WIZARDING WORLD and all related characters and elements are trademarks of and © Warner Bros. Wizarding World™ Publishing Rights © J.K. However, that isn't the case at all, and the problem comes from the dishonesty of the series and what it is actually about. From a massive recasting to a cast member assaulting people to the author of the work going off the TERF deep end, the Fantastic Beasts series feels like it has been a misstep from nearly right out of the gate. ![]() has not greenlit movies four and five, and to say that this series has been messy behind the scenes might be a bit of an understatement. Rowling herself have left its future up in the air.Last weekend, Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore was released, and while it was the number one movie at the box office, it didn't exactly make a ton of money either. There are, tentatively, still two more movies left in the Fantastic Beasts series, though repeated controversies involving the franchise’s stars and author J.K. Newt has to put together a ragtag team - including his old friend, the Muggle baker Jacob Kowalski (Dan Folger). Most recently, Albus Dumbledore (Jude Lawy, portraying a younger version of the character) has recruited Newt to help thwart the dark wizard Gellert Grindelwald ( Mads Mikkelsen, who replaces actor Johnny Depp). Subsequent movies in the sub-series have moved further away from fantastic beasts and their dwellings, as Newt keeps finding himself entangled in the battle between good and evil. The first movie centered on awkward magizoologist Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne), the author of in-universe textbook Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. The film takes place in the same universe as Harry Potter, though it is set in the 1920s. The movie premiered on April 6 and is the latest installment in the Harry Potter spinoff series. Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore will be available on HBO Max on May 30. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |